| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Conflicts:
- `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md`:
Upstream added the `bug` label to bug reports.
Did the same.
- `app/services/fan_out_on_write_service.rb`:
Upstream put DMs back into timelines, glitch-soc was already doing it.
Ignored upstream changes.
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
- README.md
discarded upstream changes
- app/controllers/api/v1/bookmarks_controller.rb
finally merged upstream, some code style fixes
and slightly changed pagination code
- app/controllers/application_controller.rb
changed upstream to always return HTML error pages
slight conflict caused by theming code
- app/models/bookmark.rb
finally merged upstream, no real conflict
- spec/controllers/api/v1/bookmarks_controller_spec.rb
finally merged upstream, slightly changed pagination code
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md
Took our version.
- CONTRIBUTING.md
Updated the embedded copy of upstream's version.
- README.md
Took our version.
- app/policies/status_policy.rb
Not a real conflict, took code from both.
- app/views/layouts/embedded.html.haml
Added upstream's changes (dns-prefetch) and fixed
`%body.embed`
- app/views/settings/preferences/show.html.haml
Reverted some of upstream changes, as we have a
page dedicated for flavours and skins.
- config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb
Kept our version of the CSP.
- config/initializers/doorkeeper.rb
Not a real conflict, took code from both.
|
|
|
|
* Update issue templates
* Update bug_report.md
* Update feature_request.md
* Update support.md
* Update feature_request.md
|
|
We don't have releases, so it don't make sense to mention.
On the other hand, a lot of our code is from upstream, so encourage people to
check whether it is a bug in glitch-soc or upstream.
|
|
* Multiple Issue templates
* Update bug_report.md
|
