| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This simplifies the implementation considerably, and while not providing
ideal UX, it's the most flexible approach.
|
|
Upshot of CAPTCHA on e-mail validation is it does not need to break the in-band
registration API.
|
|
|
|
Fixes #1649
This requires setting `HCAPTCHA_SECRET_KEY` and `HCAPTCHA_SITE_KEY`, then
enabling the admin setting at
`/admin/settings/edit#form_admin_settings_captcha_enabled`
Subsequently, a hCaptcha widget will be displayed on `/about` and
`/auth/sign_up` unless:
- the user is already signed-up already
- the user has used an invite link
- the user has already solved the captcha (and registration failed for another
reason)
The Content-Security-Policy headers are altered automatically to allow the
third-party hCaptcha scripts on `/about` and `/auth/sign_up` following the same
rules as above.
|
|
Conflicts:
- `spec/models/status_spec.rb`:
Upstream added tests too close to glitch-soc-specific tests.
Kept both tests.
|
|
* Remove support for OAUTH_REDIRECT_AT_SIGN_IN
Fixes #15959
Introduced in #6540, OAUTH_REDIRECT_AT_SIGN_IN allowed skipping the log-in form
to instead redirect to the external OmniAuth login provider.
However, it did not prevent the log-in form on /about introduced by #10232 from
appearing, and completely broke with the introduction of #15228.
As I restoring that previous log-in flow without introducing a security
vulnerability may require extensive care and knowledge of how OmniAuth works,
this commit removes support for OAUTH_REDIRECT_AT_SIGN_IN instead for the time
being.
* Add OMNIAUTH_ONLY environment variable to enforce external log-in only
* Disable user registration when OMNIAUTH_ONLY is set to true
* Replace log-in links When OMNIAUTH_ONLY is set with exactly one OmniAuth provider
|
|
Fixes #15959
Introduced in #6540, OAUTH_REDIRECT_AT_SIGN_IN allowed skipping the log-in form
to instead redirect to the external OmniAuth login provider.
However, it did not prevent the log-in form on /about introduced by #10232 from
appearing, and completely broke with the introduction of #15228.
As I restoring that previous log-in flow without introducing a security
vulnerability may require extensive care and knowledge of how OmniAuth works,
this commit removes support for OAUTH_REDIRECT_AT_SIGN_IN instead for the time
being.
|
|
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Upstream added some text, but our README is completely different.
Kept our README unchanged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up until now, we have used Devise's Rememberable mechanism to re-log users
after the end of their browser sessions. This mechanism relies on a signed
cookie containing a token. That token was stored on the user's record,
meaning it was shared across all logged in browsers, meaning truly revoking
a browser's ability to auto-log-in involves revoking the token itself, and
revoking access from *all* logged-in browsers.
We had a session mechanism that dynamically checks whether a user's session
has been disabled, and would log out the user if so. However, this would only
clear a session being actively used, and a new one could be respawned with
the `remember_user_token` cookie.
In practice, this caused two issues:
- sessions could be revived after being closed from /auth/edit (security issue)
- auto-log-in would be disabled for *all* browsers after logging out from one
of them
This PR removes the `remember_token` mechanism and treats the `_session_id`
cookie/token as a browser-specific `remember_token`, fixing both issues.
|
|
|
|
* Add tests
* Fix webauthn secure key authentication
Fixes #16769
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#16607)
* Add tests
* Add security-related tests
My first (unpublished) attempt at fixing the issues introduced (extremely
hard-to-exploit) security vulnerabilities, addressing them in a test.
* Fix authentication failures after going halfway through a sign-in attempt
* Refactor `authenticate_with_sign_in_token` and `authenticate_with_two_factor` to make the two authentication steps more obvious
|
|
The addition of authentication history broke the omniauth login with
the following error:
method=GET path=/auth/auth/cas/callback format=html
controller=Auth::OmniauthCallbacksController action=cas status=500
error='NameError: undefined local variable or method `user' for
#<Auth::OmniauthCallbacksController:0x00000000036290>
Did you mean? @user' duration=435.93 view=0.00 db=36.19
* app/controllers/auth/omniauth_callbacks_controller.rb: fix variable
name to `@user`
|
|
|
|
|
|
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Small markup change in glitch-soc, on a line that has been modified by
upstream. Ported upstream changes.
|
|
Clicking the confirmation link multiple times currently leads to entering
account settings, which can be confusing. This commit changes that so that
it redirects to the root path, so it behaves the same way as clicking only
once in most cases.
|
|
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/about_controller.rb`:
Minor conflict caused by glitch-soc's theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
|
|
* Add honeypot fields to limit non-specialized spam
Add two honeypot fields: a fake website input and a fake password confirmation
one. The label/placeholder/aria-label tells not to fill them, and they are
hidden in CSS, so legitimate users should not fall into these.
This should cut down on some non-Mastodon-specific spambots.
* Require a 3 seconds delay before submitting the registration form
* Fix tests
* Move registration form time check to model validation
* Give people a chance to clear the honeypot fields
* Refactor honeypot translation strings
Co-authored-by: Claire <claire.github-309c@sitedethib.com>
|
|
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/concerns/sign_in_token_authentication_concern.rb`:
Conflict caused because of glitch-soc's theming system.
Took upstream's new code and applied the theming system changes on top
of it.
- `app/controllers/concerns/two_factor_authentication_concern.rb`:
Conflict caused because of glitch-soc's theming system.
Took upstream's new code and applied the theming system changes on top
of it.
|
|
If someone tries logging in to an account and is prompted for a 2FA
code or sign-in token, even if the account's password or e-mail is
updated in the meantime, the session will show the prompt and allow
the login process to complete with a valid 2FA code or sign-in token
|
|
Conflicts:
- `.github/dependabot.yml`:
Updated upstream, we deleted it to not be flooded by Depandabot.
Kept deleted.
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Puma updated on both sides, went for the most recent version.
- `app/controllers/api/v1/mutes_controller.rb`:
Upstream updated the serializer to support timed mutes, while
glitch-soc added a custom API ages ago to get information that
is already available elsewhere.
Dropped the glitch-soc-specific API, went with upstream changes.
- `app/javascript/core/admin.js`:
Conflict due to changing how assets are loaded. Went with upstream.
- `app/javascript/packs/public.js`:
Conflict due to changing how assets are loaded. Went with upstream.
- `app/models/mute.rb`:
🤷
- `app/models/user.rb`:
New user setting added upstream while we have glitch-soc-specific
user settings. Added upstream's user setting.
- `config/settings.yml`:
Upstream added a new user setting close to a user setting we had
changed the defaults for. Added the new upstream setting.
- `package.json`:
Upstream dependency updated “too close” to a glitch-soc-specific
dependency. No real conflict. Updated the dependency.
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/accounts_controller.rb`:
Upstream change too close to a glitch-soc change related to
instance-local toots. Merged upstream changes.
- `app/services/fan_out_on_write_service.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's handling of Direct Messages,
merged upstream changes.
- `yarn.lock`:
Not really a conflict, caused by glitch-soc-only dependencies
being textually too close to updated upstream dependencies.
Merged upstream changes.
|
|
* feat: add possibility of adding WebAuthn security keys to use as 2FA
This adds a basic UI for enabling WebAuthn 2FA. We did a little refactor
to the Settings page for editing the 2FA methods – now it will list the
methods that are available to the user (TOTP and WebAuthn) and from
there they'll be able to add or remove any of them.
Also, it's worth mentioning that for enabling WebAuthn it's required to
have TOTP enabled, so the first time that you go to the 2FA Settings
page, you'll be asked to set it up.
This work was inspired by the one donde by Github in their platform, and
despite it could be approached in different ways, we decided to go with
this one given that we feel that this gives a great UX.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add request for WebAuthn as second factor at login if enabled
This commits adds the feature for using WebAuthn as a second factor for
login when enabled.
If users have WebAuthn enabled, now a page requesting for the use of a
WebAuthn credential for log in will appear, although a link redirecting
to the old page for logging in using a two-factor code will also be
present.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add possibility of deleting WebAuthn Credentials
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: disable WebAuthn when an Admin disables 2FA for a user
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: remove ability to disable TOTP leaving only WebAuthn as 2FA
Following examples form other platforms like Github, we decided to make
Webauthn 2FA secondary to 2FA with TOTP, so that we removed the
possibility of removing TOTP authentication only, leaving users with
just WEbAuthn as 2FA. Instead, users will have to click on 'Disable 2FA'
in order to remove second factor auth.
The reason for WebAuthn being secondary to TOPT is that in that way,
users will still be able to log in using their code from their phone's
application if they don't have their security keys with them – or maybe
even lost them.
* We had to change a little the flow for setting up TOTP, given that now
it's possible to setting up again if you already had TOTP, in order to
let users modify their authenticator app – given that now it's not
possible for them to disable TOTP and set it up again with another
authenticator app.
So, basically, now instead of storing the new `otp_secret` in the
user, we store it in the session until the process of set up is
finished.
This was because, as it was before, when users clicked on 'Edit' in
the new two-factor methods lists page, but then went back without
finishing the flow, their `otp_secret` had been changed therefore
invalidating their previous authenticator app, making them unable to
log in again using TOTP.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* refactor: fix eslint errors
The PR build was failing given that linting returning some errors.
This commit attempts to fix them.
* refactor: normalize i18n translations
The build was failing given that i18n translations files were not
normalized.
This commits fixes that.
* refactor: avoid having the webauthn gem locked to a specific version
* refactor: use symbols for routes without '/'
* refactor: avoid sending webauthn disabled email when 2FA is disabled
When an admins disable 2FA for users, we were sending two mails
to them, one notifying that 2FA was disabled and the other to notify
that WebAuthn was disabled.
As the second one is redundant since the first email includes it, we can
remove it and send just one email to users.
* refactor: avoid creating new env variable for webauthn_origin config
* refactor: improve flash error messages for webauthn pages
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
|
|
Conflicts:
- `config/routes.rb`:
Upstream disabled E2EE routes, which we did earlier, but slightly
differently. Took upstream's version.
|
|
* Fix rubocop warning
* use limit variable
* use ContextCreatingMethods option
|
|
Conflicts:
- `package.json`:
Not really a conflict, just some glitch-soc-specific dependency
too close to an upstream-updated one.
|
|
While OAuth tokens were immediately revoked, accessing the home
controller immediately generated new OAuth tokens and "revived"
the session due to a combination of using remember_me tokens and
overwriting the `authenticate_user!` method
|
|
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/activitypub/collections_controller.rb`:
Conflict due to glitch-soc having to take care of local-only
pinned toots in that controller.
Took upstream's changes and restored the local-only special
handling.
- `app/controllers/auth/sessions_controller.rb`:
Minor conflicts due to the theming system, applied upstream
changes, adapted the following two files for glitch-soc's
theming system:
- `app/controllers/concerns/sign_in_token_authentication_concern.rb`
- `app/controllers/concerns/two_factor_authentication_concern.rb`
- `app/services/backup_service.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc having to handle local-only
toots specially. Applied upstream changes and restored
the local-only special handling.
- `app/views/admin/custom_emojis/index.html.haml`:
Minor conflict due to the theming system.
- `package.json`:
Upstream dependency updated, too close to a glitch-soc-only
dependency in the file.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream dependency updated, too close to a glitch-soc-only
dependency in the file.
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Not a real conflict, just a glitch-soc-only dependency too close to a
dependency that got updated upstream. Updated as well.
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Not a real conflict, just a change too close to glitch-soc-changed code
for optionally showing boosts in public timelines.
Applied upstream changes.
- `app/views/layouts/application.html.haml`:
Upstream a new, static CSS file, conflict due to glitch-soc's theming
system, include the file regardless of the theme.
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream dropped 'unsafe-inline' from the 'style-src' directive, but
both files are very different. Removed 'unsafe-inline' as well.
|
|
When attempting to access the log-in page while already logged in,
Devise's `require_no_authentication` kicks in and sets a flash
message “You are already signed in.”
In almost all cases, this also causes a redirect to /web, which
does not display or clear flash messages, thus leaving the message
to a potentially much later date, like for instance, accessing
/preferences several minutes after being redirected to /web.
|
|
|
|
form (#13088)
* Fix user agreement not being verified
* Fix tests
* Fix up agreement field being dismissed
|
|
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/statuses_controller.rb`:
Minor conflict due to theming system
|
|
While making browser requests in the other sessions after a password
change or reset does not allow you to be logged in and correctly
invalidates the session making the request, sessions have API tokens
associated with them, which can still be used until that session
is invalidated.
This is a security issue for accounts that were already compromised
some other way because it makes it harder to throw out the hijacker.
|
|
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/application_controller.rb`:
Conflict due to theming system.
- `app/controllers/oauth/authorizations_controller.rb`:
Conflict due to theming system.
|
|
Fix #12255
|
|
Fixes #1230
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
- Gemfile
- Gemfile.lock
- app/controllers/about_controller.rb
- app/controllers/auth/sessions_controller.rb
|
|
Regression from #11831
|
|
Conflicts:
- app/controllers/auth/sessions_controller.rb
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming code
|
|
Fix #3961
|
