Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
There's nothing useful we can display if the destroy action messes up,
so might as well assert it does and complain loudly if it doesn't.
|
|
|
|
This avoids copy-pasting definitions of set_account.
|
|
There are two motivations for this:
1. It looks like we're going to add other features that require
server-side storage (e.g. user notes).
2. Namespacing glitchsoc modifications is a good idea anyway: even if we
do not end up doing (1), if upstream introduces a keyword-mute feature
that also uses a "KeywordMute" model, we can avoid some merge
conflicts this way and work on the more interesting task of
choosing which implementation to use.
|
|
Also add a destroy-all action, which can be useful if you're flushing an
old list entirely to start a new one.
|
|
|
|
This should eventually be accessible via the API and the web frontend,
but I find it easier to set up an editing interface using Rails
templates and the like. We can always take it out if it turns out we
don't need it.
|