| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
- `.github/dependabot.yml`:
Updated upstream, we deleted it to not be flooded by Depandabot.
Kept deleted.
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Puma updated on both sides, went for the most recent version.
- `app/controllers/api/v1/mutes_controller.rb`:
Upstream updated the serializer to support timed mutes, while
glitch-soc added a custom API ages ago to get information that
is already available elsewhere.
Dropped the glitch-soc-specific API, went with upstream changes.
- `app/javascript/core/admin.js`:
Conflict due to changing how assets are loaded. Went with upstream.
- `app/javascript/packs/public.js`:
Conflict due to changing how assets are loaded. Went with upstream.
- `app/models/mute.rb`:
🤷
- `app/models/user.rb`:
New user setting added upstream while we have glitch-soc-specific
user settings. Added upstream's user setting.
- `config/settings.yml`:
Upstream added a new user setting close to a user setting we had
changed the defaults for. Added the new upstream setting.
- `package.json`:
Upstream dependency updated “too close” to a glitch-soc-specific
dependency. No real conflict. Updated the dependency.
|
|
This PR updates the `valid_url` regex and sanitizer allowlist to provide
support for Gemini urls.
Closes #14991
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/accounts_controller.rb`:
Upstream change too close to a glitch-soc change related to
instance-local toots. Merged upstream changes.
- `app/services/fan_out_on_write_service.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's handling of Direct Messages,
merged upstream changes.
- `yarn.lock`:
Not really a conflict, caused by glitch-soc-only dependencies
being textually too close to updated upstream dependencies.
Merged upstream changes.
|
|
* feat: add possibility of adding WebAuthn security keys to use as 2FA
This adds a basic UI for enabling WebAuthn 2FA. We did a little refactor
to the Settings page for editing the 2FA methods – now it will list the
methods that are available to the user (TOTP and WebAuthn) and from
there they'll be able to add or remove any of them.
Also, it's worth mentioning that for enabling WebAuthn it's required to
have TOTP enabled, so the first time that you go to the 2FA Settings
page, you'll be asked to set it up.
This work was inspired by the one donde by Github in their platform, and
despite it could be approached in different ways, we decided to go with
this one given that we feel that this gives a great UX.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add request for WebAuthn as second factor at login if enabled
This commits adds the feature for using WebAuthn as a second factor for
login when enabled.
If users have WebAuthn enabled, now a page requesting for the use of a
WebAuthn credential for log in will appear, although a link redirecting
to the old page for logging in using a two-factor code will also be
present.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add possibility of deleting WebAuthn Credentials
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: disable WebAuthn when an Admin disables 2FA for a user
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: remove ability to disable TOTP leaving only WebAuthn as 2FA
Following examples form other platforms like Github, we decided to make
Webauthn 2FA secondary to 2FA with TOTP, so that we removed the
possibility of removing TOTP authentication only, leaving users with
just WEbAuthn as 2FA. Instead, users will have to click on 'Disable 2FA'
in order to remove second factor auth.
The reason for WebAuthn being secondary to TOPT is that in that way,
users will still be able to log in using their code from their phone's
application if they don't have their security keys with them – or maybe
even lost them.
* We had to change a little the flow for setting up TOTP, given that now
it's possible to setting up again if you already had TOTP, in order to
let users modify their authenticator app – given that now it's not
possible for them to disable TOTP and set it up again with another
authenticator app.
So, basically, now instead of storing the new `otp_secret` in the
user, we store it in the session until the process of set up is
finished.
This was because, as it was before, when users clicked on 'Edit' in
the new two-factor methods lists page, but then went back without
finishing the flow, their `otp_secret` had been changed therefore
invalidating their previous authenticator app, making them unable to
log in again using TOTP.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* refactor: fix eslint errors
The PR build was failing given that linting returning some errors.
This commit attempts to fix them.
* refactor: normalize i18n translations
The build was failing given that i18n translations files were not
normalized.
This commits fixes that.
* refactor: avoid having the webauthn gem locked to a specific version
* refactor: use symbols for routes without '/'
* refactor: avoid sending webauthn disabled email when 2FA is disabled
When an admins disable 2FA for users, we were sending two mails
to them, one notifying that 2FA was disabled and the other to notify
that WebAuthn was disabled.
As the second one is redundant since the first email includes it, we can
remove it and send just one email to users.
* refactor: avoid creating new env variable for webauthn_origin config
* refactor: improve flash error messages for webauthn pages
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
|
|
Conflicts:
- `package.json`:
Not really a conflict, just some glitch-soc-specific dependency
too close to an upstream-updated one.
|
|
- Rate limit login attempts by target account
- Rate limit password resets and e-mail re-confirmations by target account
- Rate limit sign-up/login attempts, password resets, and e-mail re-confirmations by IP like before
|
|
* Enable nonces for stylesheets
* Pass nonce to react-select
|
|
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/packs/public.js`:
Conflict because part of that file has been split to
`app/javascript/core/settings.js`. Ported those changes
there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
- `.env.production.sample`:
Upstream deleted it, I decided to keep it.
- `package.json`:
Upstream updated a dependency textually too close to wavesurfer.js
which has been deleted from upstream but is kept in glitch-soc for now.
|
|
Localization strings:
- "Whitelist mode" -> "Limited federation mode"
- "Blacklist e-mail domain" -> "Block e-mail domain"
- "Whitelist domain" -> "Allow domain for federation"
...And so on
Environment variables (backwards-compatible):
- `WHITELIST_MODE` -> `LIMITED_FEDERATION_MODE`
- `EMAIL_DOMAIN_BLACKLIST` -> `EMAIL_DOMAIN_DENYLIST`
- `EMAIL_DOMAIN_WHITELIST` -> `EMAIL_DOMAIN_ALLOWLIST`
tootctl:
- `tootctl domains purge --whitelist-mode` -> `tootctl domains purge --limited-federation-mode`
Removed badly maintained and no longer relevant .env.production.sample file
|
|
Conflicts:
- `Gemfile.lock`: not a real conflict, upstream update too close
to a glitch-soc-specific dependency
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/activitypub/collections_controller.rb`:
Conflict due to glitch-soc having to take care of local-only
pinned toots in that controller.
Took upstream's changes and restored the local-only special
handling.
- `app/controllers/auth/sessions_controller.rb`:
Minor conflicts due to the theming system, applied upstream
changes, adapted the following two files for glitch-soc's
theming system:
- `app/controllers/concerns/sign_in_token_authentication_concern.rb`
- `app/controllers/concerns/two_factor_authentication_concern.rb`
- `app/services/backup_service.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc having to handle local-only
toots specially. Applied upstream changes and restored
the local-only special handling.
- `app/views/admin/custom_emojis/index.html.haml`:
Minor conflict due to the theming system.
- `package.json`:
Upstream dependency updated, too close to a glitch-soc-only
dependency in the file.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream dependency updated, too close to a glitch-soc-only
dependency in the file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Not a real conflict, just a glitch-soc-only dependency too close to a
dependency that got updated upstream. Updated as well.
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Not a real conflict, just a change too close to glitch-soc-changed code
for optionally showing boosts in public timelines.
Applied upstream changes.
- `app/views/layouts/application.html.haml`:
Upstream a new, static CSS file, conflict due to glitch-soc's theming
system, include the file regardless of the theme.
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream dropped 'unsafe-inline' from the 'style-src' directive, but
both files are very different. Removed 'unsafe-inline' as well.
|
|
|
|
* Fix "tootctl media remove-orphans" crashing on “Import” files
* Also remove empty directories when removing orphaned media
|
|
* Make sure wicg-inert doesn't rely on inline CSS
* Remove unsafe-inline from style-src
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/statuses_controller.rb`:
Upstream disabled the embed controller for reblogs.
Not a real conflict, but glitch-soc has an extra line to deal
with its theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/javascript/packs/public.js`:
Upstream made changes to get rid of most inline CSS, this changes
javascript for public pages, which in glitch are split between
different files. Ported those changes.
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Upstream changed the block check in `Status#permitted_for` to
include domain-block checks. Not a real conflict with glitch-soc,
but our scope is slightly different, as our scope for
unauthenticated access do not include instance-local toots.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/serializers/rest/instance_serializer.rb`:
Not a real conflict, upstream added a new field to the instance
serializer, the conflict is one line above since we added more of
that.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/views/settings/profiles/show.html.haml`:
Upstream got rid of most inline CSS and moved hidden elements
to data attributes in the process, in fields were we have
different values.
Ported upstream changes while keeping our glitch-specific
values.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Upstream got rid of inline CSS on an HAML line we treat
differently, stripping empty text nodes.
Ported upstream changes to the style attribute, keeping
the empty text node stripping behavior.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix #13484
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/mastodon/features/compose/components/poll_form.js`:
Upstream bumped poll option character limit, but we already had
a higher one, kept ours.
- `app/validators/poll_validator.rb`:
Upstream bumped poll option character limit, but we already had
a higher one, kept ours.
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream added a rule, the way we compute ours is different, but
that added rule has been ported.
- `package.json`:
No real conflict, dependency update. Performed the same update.
- `yarn.lock`:
No real conflict, dependency update. Performed the same update.
|
|
Also:
- Fix locks not being removed when jobs go to the dead job queue
- Add UI for managing locks to the Sidekiq dashboard
- Remove unused Sidekiq workers
Fix #13349
|
|
Fix #13330
|
|
Fixes #13321
|
|
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Our README.md files are completely different. Discarded upstream changes.
- `app/javascript/core/admin.js`:
Updating rails-ujs, no real conflict, but a comment to close to changed
code. Various glitch-soc-only files have been updated to match those changes,
though.
- `package.json`:
No real conflict, just an additional dependency in glitch-soc that was too
close to something updated upstream. Took upstream's changes.
|
|
* Bump sidekiq from 5.2.7 to 6.0.0
Bumps [sidekiq](https://github.com/mperham/sidekiq) from 5.2.7 to 6.0.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/mperham/sidekiq/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/mperham/sidekiq/blob/master/Changes.md)
- [Commits](https://github.com/mperham/sidekiq/compare/v5.2.7...v6.0.0)
Signed-off-by: dependabot-preview[bot] <support@dependabot.com>
* Sidekiq::Logger.logger -> Sidekiq.logger
* Drop support Ruby 2.4
* update
Co-authored-by: dependabot-preview[bot] <27856297+dependabot-preview[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Yamagishi Kazutoshi <ykzts@desire.sh>
|
|
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/api/v1/statuses_controller.rb`:
Conflict due to upstream adding a new parameter (with_rate_limit),
too close to glitch-soc's own additional parameter (content_type).
Added upstream's parameter.
- `app/services/post_status_service.rb`:
Conflict due to upstream adding a new parameter (rate_limit),
too close to glitch-soc's own additional parameter (content_type).
Added upstream's parameter.
- `app/views/settings/preferences/appearance/show.html.haml`:
Conflict due to us not exposing theme settings here (as we have
a different flavour/skin menu).
Took upstream change, while still not exposing theme settings.
- `config/webpack/shared.js`:
Coding style fixes for a part we have rewritten.
Discarded upstream changes.
|
|
|
|
migrations
|
|
Fixes #1276
|
|
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/statuses_controller.rb`:
Minor conflict due to theming system
|
|
* Add announcements
Fix #11006
* Add reactions to announcements
* Add admin UI for announcements
* Add unit tests
* Fix issues
- Add `with_dismissed` param to announcements API
- Fix end date not being formatted when time range is given
- Fix announcement delete causing reactions to send streaming updates
- Fix announcements container growing too wide and mascot too small
- Fix `all_day` being settable when no time range is given
- Change text "Update" to "Announcement"
* Fix scheduler unpublishing announcements before they are due
* Fix filter params not being passed to announcements filter
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
- `Gemfile.lock`:
No real conflict, glitch-soc-only dependency (redcarpet) too close to an
upstream one (rdf-normalize)
- `README.md`:
we have different READMEs, discarded upstream's changes
- `app/views/admin/custom_emojis/index.html.haml`:
No real conflict, different context because of glitch-soc theming
- `lib/mastodon/statuses_cli.rb`:
Upstream added code to keep bookmarked statuses, we were already doing so
with slightly different code. Discarded upstream's changes.
- `package.json`:
No real conflict, glitch-soc-only dependency (favico.js) too close to
an upstream one
|
