Merge branch 'main' into glitch-soc/merge-upstream

Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
  Upstream updated copyright year, we don't mention it so kept our version.
- `app/controllers/admin/dashboard_controller.rb`:
  Not really a conflict, upstream change (removing the spam checker) too close
  to glitch-soc changes. Ported upstream changes.
- `app/models/form/admin_settings.rb`:
  Same.
- `app/services/remove_status_service.rb`:
  Same.
- `app/views/admin/settings/edit.html.haml`:
  Same.
- `config/settings.yml`:
  Same.
- `config/environments/production.rb`:
  Not a real conflict, upstream added a default HTTP header, but we have
  extra headers in glitch-soc.
  Added the header.

2 files changed, 0 insertions, 228 deletions

diff --git a/spec/lib/spam_check_spec.rb b/spec/lib/spam_check_spec.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index 159d83257..000000000
--- a/spec/lib/spam_check_spec.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,192 +0,0 @@
-# frozen_string_literal: true
-
-require 'rails_helper'
-
-RSpec.describe SpamCheck do
-  let!(:sender) { Fabricate(:account) }
-  let!(:alice) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'alice') }
-  let!(:bob) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'bob') }
-
-  def status_with_html(text, options = {})
-    status = PostStatusService.new.call(sender, { text: text }.merge(options))
-    status.update_columns(text: Formatter.instance.format(status), local: false)
-    status
-  end
-
-  describe '#hashable_text' do
-    it 'removes mentions from HTML for remote statuses' do
-      status = status_with_html('@alice Hello')
-      expect(described_class.new(status).hashable_text).to eq 'hello'
-    end
-
-    it 'removes mentions from text for local statuses' do
-      status = PostStatusService.new.call(alice, text: "Hey @#{sender.username}, how are you?")
-      expect(described_class.new(status).hashable_text).to eq 'hey , how are you?'
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#insufficient_data?' do
-    it 'returns true when there is no text' do
-      status = status_with_html('@alice')
-      expect(described_class.new(status).insufficient_data?).to be true
-    end
-
-    it 'returns false when there is text' do
-      status = status_with_html('@alice h')
-      expect(described_class.new(status).insufficient_data?).to be false
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#digest' do
-    it 'returns a string' do
-      status = status_with_html('@alice Hello world')
-      expect(described_class.new(status).digest).to be_a String
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#spam?' do
-    it 'returns false for a unique status' do
-      status = status_with_html('@alice Hello')
-      expect(described_class.new(status).spam?).to be false
-    end
-
-    it 'returns false for different statuses to the same recipient' do
-      status1 = status_with_html('@alice Hello')
-      described_class.new(status1).remember!
-      status2 = status_with_html('@alice Are you available to talk?')
-      expect(described_class.new(status2).spam?).to be false
-    end
-
-    it 'returns false for statuses with different content warnings' do
-      status1 = status_with_html('@alice Are you available to talk?')
-      described_class.new(status1).remember!
-      status2 = status_with_html('@alice Are you available to talk?', spoiler_text: 'This is a completely different matter than what I was talking about previously, I swear!')
-      expect(described_class.new(status2).spam?).to be false
-    end
-
-    it 'returns false for different statuses to different recipients' do
-      status1 = status_with_html('@alice How is it going?')
-      described_class.new(status1).remember!
-      status2 = status_with_html('@bob Are you okay?')
-      expect(described_class.new(status2).spam?).to be false
-    end
-
-    it 'returns false for very short different statuses to different recipients' do
-      status1 = status_with_html('@alice 🙄')
-      described_class.new(status1).remember!
-      status2 = status_with_html('@bob Huh?')
-      expect(described_class.new(status2).spam?).to be false
-    end
-
-    it 'returns false for statuses with no text' do
-      status1 = status_with_html('@alice')
-      described_class.new(status1).remember!
-      status2 = status_with_html('@bob')
-      expect(described_class.new(status2).spam?).to be false
-    end
-
-    it 'returns true for duplicate statuses to the same recipient' do
-      described_class::THRESHOLD.times do
-        status1 = status_with_html('@alice Hello')
-        described_class.new(status1).remember!
-      end
-
-      status2 = status_with_html('@alice Hello')
-      expect(described_class.new(status2).spam?).to be true
-    end
-
-    it 'returns true for duplicate statuses to different recipients' do
-      described_class::THRESHOLD.times do
-        status1 = status_with_html('@alice Hello')
-        described_class.new(status1).remember!
-      end
-
-      status2 = status_with_html('@bob Hello')
-      expect(described_class.new(status2).spam?).to be true
-    end
-
-    it 'returns true for nearly identical statuses with random numbers' do
-      source_text = 'Sodium, atomic number 11, was first isolated by Humphry Davy in 1807. A chemical component of salt, he named it Na in honor of the saltiest region on earth, North America.'
-
-      described_class::THRESHOLD.times do
-        status1 = status_with_html('@alice ' + source_text + ' 1234')
-        described_class.new(status1).remember!
-      end
-
-      status2 = status_with_html('@bob ' + source_text + ' 9568')
-      expect(described_class.new(status2).spam?).to be true
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#skip?' do
-    it 'returns true when the sender is already silenced' do
-      status = status_with_html('@alice Hello')
-      sender.silence!
-      expect(described_class.new(status).skip?).to be true
-    end
-
-    it 'returns true when the mentioned person follows the sender' do
-      status = status_with_html('@alice Hello')
-      alice.follow!(sender)
-      expect(described_class.new(status).skip?).to be true
-    end
-
-    it 'returns false when even one mentioned person doesn\'t follow the sender' do
-      status = status_with_html('@alice @bob Hello')
-      alice.follow!(sender)
-      expect(described_class.new(status).skip?).to be false
-    end
-
-    it 'returns true when the sender is replying to a status that mentions the sender' do
-      parent = PostStatusService.new.call(alice, text: "Hey @#{sender.username}, how are you?")
-      status = status_with_html('@alice @bob Hello', thread: parent)
-      expect(described_class.new(status).skip?).to be true
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#remember!' do
-    let(:status) { status_with_html('@alice') }
-    let(:spam_check) { described_class.new(status) }
-    let(:redis_key) { spam_check.send(:redis_key) }
-
-    it 'remembers' do
-      expect(Redis.current.exists?(redis_key)).to be true
-      spam_check.remember!
-      expect(Redis.current.exists?(redis_key)).to be true
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#reset!' do
-    let(:status) { status_with_html('@alice') }
-    let(:spam_check) { described_class.new(status) }
-    let(:redis_key) { spam_check.send(:redis_key) }
-
-    before do
-      spam_check.remember!
-    end
-
-    it 'resets' do
-      expect(Redis.current.exists?(redis_key)).to be true
-      spam_check.reset!
-      expect(Redis.current.exists?(redis_key)).to be false
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#flag!' do
-    let!(:status1) { status_with_html('@alice General Kenobi you are a bold one') }
-    let!(:status2) { status_with_html('@alice @bob General Kenobi, you are a bold one') }
-
-    before do
-      described_class.new(status1).remember!
-      described_class.new(status2).flag!
-    end
-
-    it 'creates a report about the account' do
-      expect(sender.targeted_reports.unresolved.count).to eq 1
-    end
-
-    it 'attaches both matching statuses to the report' do
-      expect(sender.targeted_reports.first.status_ids).to include(status1.id, status2.id)
-    end
-  end
-end
diff --git a/spec/lib/tag_manager_spec.rb b/spec/lib/tag_manager_spec.rb
index e9a7aa934..2230f9710 100644
--- a/spec/lib/tag_manager_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/tag_manager_spec.rb
@@ -83,40 +83,4 @@ RSpec.describe TagManager do
       expect(TagManager.instance.local_url?('https://domainn.test/')).to eq false
     end
   end
-
-  describe '#same_acct?' do
-    # The following comparisons MUST be case-insensitive.
-
-    it 'returns true if the needle has a correct username and domain for remote user' do
-      expect(TagManager.instance.same_acct?('username@domain.test', 'UsErNaMe@DoMaIn.Test')).to eq true
-    end
-
-    it 'returns false if the needle is missing a domain for remote user' do
-      expect(TagManager.instance.same_acct?('username@domain.test', 'UsErNaMe')).to eq false
-    end
-
-    it 'returns false if the needle has an incorrect domain for remote user' do
-      expect(TagManager.instance.same_acct?('username@domain.test', 'UsErNaMe@incorrect.test')).to eq false
-    end
-
-    it 'returns false if the needle has an incorrect username for remote user' do
-      expect(TagManager.instance.same_acct?('username@domain.test', 'incorrect@DoMaIn.test')).to eq false
-    end
-
-    it 'returns true if the needle has a correct username and domain for local user' do
-      expect(TagManager.instance.same_acct?('username', 'UsErNaMe@Cb6E6126.nGrOk.Io')).to eq true
-    end
-
-    it 'returns true if the needle is missing a domain for local user' do
-      expect(TagManager.instance.same_acct?('username', 'UsErNaMe')).to eq true
-    end
-
-    it 'returns false if the needle has an incorrect username for local user' do
-      expect(TagManager.instance.same_acct?('username', 'UsErNaM@Cb6E6126.nGrOk.Io')).to eq false
-    end
-
-    it 'returns false if the needle has an incorrect domain for local user' do
-      expect(TagManager.instance.same_acct?('username', 'incorrect@Cb6E6126.nGrOk.Io')).to eq false
-    end
-  end
 end