diff options
| author | Claire <claire.github-309c@sitedethib.com> | 2022-11-17 11:55:50 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Claire <claire.github-309c@sitedethib.com> | 2022-11-17 12:01:37 +0100 |
| commit | aec61a703f4c1f4724bbb5b912504e19b3303e9d (patch) | |
| tree | acae2d7026668653b585ead9af4be3523851ba13 /spec/services | |
| parent | ab7d99e035f5b880ef77440e7c2e76f8e8728992 (diff) | |
| parent | 585cc1a604f6c445436b5bea23c1eb2f899300c3 (diff) | |
Merge branch 'main' into glitch-soc/merge-upstream
Conflicts: - `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`: Upstream changed how docker images were built, including how they were cached. I don't know much about it, so applied upstream's changes. - `app/controllers/admin/domain_blocks_controller.rb`: The feature, that was in glitch-soc, got backported upstream. It also had a few fixes upstream, so those have been ported! - `app/javascript/packs/admin.js`: Glitch-soc changes have been backported upstream. As a result, some code from `app/javascript/core/admin.js` got added upstream. Kept our version since our shared Javascript already has that feature. - `app/models/user.rb`: Upstream added something to distinguish unusable and unusable-because-moved accounts, while glitch-soc considers moved accounts usable. Took upstream's code for `functional_or_moved?` and made `functional?` call it. - `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`: Upstream cleaned up code style a bit, on a line that we had custom changes for. Applied upstream's change while keeping our change. - `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`: Upstream adopted one CSP directive we already had. The conflict is because of our files being structurally different, but the change itself was already part of glitch-soc. Kept our version.
Diffstat (limited to 'spec/services')
| -rw-r--r-- | spec/services/favourite_service_spec.rb | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | spec/services/follow_service_spec.rb | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | spec/services/verify_link_service_spec.rb | 20 |
3 files changed, 21 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/spec/services/favourite_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/favourite_service_spec.rb index 94a8111dd..9781f0d78 100644 --- a/spec/services/favourite_service_spec.rb +++ b/spec/services/favourite_service_spec.rb @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ RSpec.describe FavouriteService, type: :service do let(:status) { Fabricate(:status, account: bob) } before do - stub_request(:post, "http://example.com/inbox").to_return(:status => 200, :body => "", :headers => {}) + stub_request(:post, "http://example.com/inbox").to_return(status: 200, body: "", headers: {}) subject.call(sender, status) end diff --git a/spec/services/follow_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/follow_service_spec.rb index 88346ec54..412c04d76 100644 --- a/spec/services/follow_service_spec.rb +++ b/spec/services/follow_service_spec.rb @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ RSpec.describe FollowService, type: :service do let(:bob) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'bob', domain: 'example.com', protocol: :activitypub, inbox_url: 'http://example.com/inbox') } before do - stub_request(:post, "http://example.com/inbox").to_return(:status => 200, :body => "", :headers => {}) + stub_request(:post, "http://example.com/inbox").to_return(status: 200, body: "", headers: {}) subject.call(sender, bob) end diff --git a/spec/services/verify_link_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/verify_link_service_spec.rb index 3fc88e60e..52ba454cc 100644 --- a/spec/services/verify_link_service_spec.rb +++ b/spec/services/verify_link_service_spec.rb @@ -76,7 +76,25 @@ RSpec.describe VerifyLinkService, type: :service do context 'when a link does not contain a link back' do let(:html) { '' } - it 'marks the field as verified' do + it 'does not mark the field as verified' do + expect(field.verified?).to be false + end + end + + context 'when link has no `href` attribute' do + let(:html) do + <<-HTML + <!doctype html> + <head> + <link type="text/html" rel="me" /> + </head> + <body> + <a rel="me" target="_blank">Follow me on Mastodon</a> + </body> + HTML + end + + it 'does not mark the field as verified' do expect(field.verified?).to be false end end |